Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

The flywheel model you laid out is really well thought through, especially the part about everything needing to be reusable more than once. That constraint forces clarity on what's actually worth creating vs busywork. I've seen too many consultants get trapped in custom one-off deliverables that drain time without compounding value. What jumped out was the Okta identity security piece, becuase agentic AI is already creating huge identity sprawl issues that most orgs haven't even begun to address. The gap between what's being built and what's being secured is getting pretty wild.

dichotomy media's avatar

"you cannot outsource your knowledge and thinking to AI. forming your own opinions without AI is one of the most critical things you can do for yourself."

this hit different coming from someone who advises on AI for a living.

the flywheel model you've described — insights feeding advisory feeding speaking feeding workshops — is the kind of compounding that actually works. but it only works because you're the one connecting the dots. the AI can't build your relationships. it can't show up at oktane and notice the identity security implications for agents. that's human pattern-matching.

here's the dichotomy i keep circling: the people who understand AI best are often the most clear-eyed about its limitations. meanwhile, the loudest AI evangelists are frequently the ones who've never tried to deploy it in a real workflow. confidence and competence have become inversely correlated.

your "everything i create has to be reusable more than once" constraint is something i'm stealing. that's the discipline that separates thought leadership from content production. most people create for the moment. you're creating for the compound.

curious: after a year of independence, what surprised you most about where the money actually is vs. where you expected it to be?

No posts

Ready for more?